Put your Jurisdiction statement in here. Below is an example of what I have submitted as a jurisdiction statement. You should consult your statutes, and rules of court for your particular jurisdiction. WARNING Jurisdiction can be a problem if the courts do not want to grant it. This particular portion is important to getting your cause heard.

Comes now the plaintiff, Lee Allen Martin, pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 75.01 and asks the court to amend the Order of 29<SUP>th</SUP> day of September 1999 based upon the following facts as pertains to the Order filed on the1<SUP>st</SUP> day of October 1999:

The following text boxes are all facts, Judges will on ly reconsider their order based on facts.

The redaction charge to the plaintiff set by ORDER number 5 is not authorized by the provisions of 610.026 RSMo.

The public governmental record in question is maintained in electronic format and should be provided to the plaintiff within the next 10 days.

If all of the public governmental record is not in electronic format what is in electronic format should be immediately made available to the plaintiff, via the internet or 3.5 inch floppy disc in the word processing format that it is presently maintained in. The charge for this record should be set by RSMo 610.026.2, "shall include only the cost of copies, staff time required for making copies and programming, if necessary, and the disk or tape used for the duplication. "

If the Charge for these records exceed nominal the Defendant should certify said charges

Plaintiff notes finding #5 of the Order that states the public governmental records in question "may" contain information that would be governed by 610.100.3. In light of the "may"" the plaintiff must request that objection to whatever fictional redaction that is presented to the court will be moot if the court finds that none of these records should be redacted.

The plaintiff would request that the honorable court issue finding that said redaction's of a public governmental record are authorized by RSMo 610.100.3.

That the honorable court make a final decision on the issues and facts and law so that the plaintiff may take the necessary lawful procedure.

Here is the prayer for relief, tell the court what you want. You may not think it but the court did make compromises with me on this motion.

In light of the facts presented to the Honorable Court the plaintiff must request that the honorable court amend the Order of September 29, 1999 to allow the plaintiff to receive said public governmental record in a timely fashion pursuant the RSMo 610., and amend the Honorable Courts ruling allowing redaction cost. Plaintiff would request that the Honorable Court issue findings as to the legality of the redaction of the public governmental record in question.

Respectfully Submitted,

I hereby certify this pleading was served upon all attorneys of record for each of the parties to this action and All parties not represented by counsel, in the following manner:
___ By delivering a copy to him/her;
___ By leaving a copy at his/her office with the clerk;
___ By leaving a copy at his/her office with an attorney associated with him/her;
___ By mailing a copy to him/her, as prescribed by law;
___ By faxing a copy to him/her.

The foregoing pleading will be called for hearing before the court on at 1 pm or as soon thereafter as petitioner may be heard.

So noticed: _______________________________